• chasrmartin

    No they aren’t. They’re high, but there are lots of places that are higher: http://webecoist.momtastic.com/2013/01/22/hot-spots-earths-5-most-naturally-radioactive-places/2/

  • Harry S Truman

    You are all idiots that have no idea what you are are talking about.


  • All AGlow

    It just blows me away that no one seems to correlate the Rocky Flats Nuclear Weapons site with the high radiation levels in Colorado. The plant operated from 1951 to 1994, and had some of the worst plutonium fires in the history of planet earth, leaving giant plumes of radiation spreading over Denver’s suburban communities. Tonnes of radioactive waste are sitting beneath 3 feet of soil on 11,000 acres of windswept land 9 miles from Boulder. Plutonium has a 24,000 year half life, and is not deemed safe for humans until after about 500,000 years. Read “Full Body Burden” if you can still sleep at night, or have children.

    • TJ

      The issue of radiation is not as simple as “there was a plant”. Radiation is present in many forms and the decay structure is complicated and ever changing. So, the question should be what type of radiation are we talking about and what is the source.

      • Mike Hardaker


        I agree, radiation is around us everywhere. Honestly the levels are far to high. As someone mentioned we believe the atmosphere around Colorado is capturing these emissions due to the height of the mountains?

        Hence why near bye states have lower levels?


    • chasrmartin

      It blows me away that people do.

  • Mbert

    Uhh… When I first started looking at these numbers a little over a year ago most sites said that over 60 cpm was rare even at higher altitudes. Most readings were 13-16 avg and upto 30 cpm could be caused naturally. Looks like we are double what I saw these maps looking like a year ago. I just got my inspector alert and I’m barely going below 20cpm, which is the opposite of what I heard people say a year ago. We’re Fukushimmed.

  • Cam Worftner

    I toured the japanese power plant for the U.S government back in the late 70’s.
    Telling the CEO about the possibility of flooding in the generator station.
    Suggesting mounting generators on the roofs. His reply, they will rust.
    So I suggested a power cord to the roof, he said that he would think about it.
    I later found out his parents and entire family were killed during wwII.
    Resentment is a powerful tool that spans life times.

  • John

    I realize I’m a little late to comment here, but it is no surprise that Colorado has higher radiation readings than all the other states and it has nothing to do with Fukushima. The higher background is because the thinner atmosphere (higher elevations) provides less shielding against cosmic radiation from space. The national radiation map on this page is not likely to have given any indication of radioactivity arriving here from Japan because the levels are so small that any readings would be lost in the random fluctuations of the background rad field. This is probably a good time to mention that although Colorado has the highest average background radiation levels in the US, the state has some of the lowest cancer incidence and death rates in the country, around 10% below national levels.

    • Mike Hardaker


      Thank you for taking the time to comment, never to late!! Very interesting info especially the part about Colorado’s cancer level? I wonder if all the active healthy people in the state also play into that figure. It makes sense that higher elevation = a thinner atmosphere.


  • james

    it would be smart to put healthy iodine in our thyroid glands

    • Mike Hardaker


      Thanks for the comment, we have been hearing things on both sides good and bad.