Better on the skin track but still needs some work. The Lib Tech Split BRD has all the makings of the perfect split. The board is lightweight, eco-friendly, super spirited and comes with a C3 Camber profile. What more do you need?
Camber Profile for Touring
Let’s start with what works with the Lib Tech Split BRD Splitboard. Lib Technologies designed a fun shape that has a wider and longer nose than past splits in the line. If you ever a chance to ride the GNU Beast splitboard the Lib Tech Split BRD will be similar here’s what we had to say about the Beast in 2015.
The GNU Beast has camber under your feet and a slight rocker between, called mellow banana. The camber under foot is awesome, and the added float of the rocker is noticeable in pow and heavier snow.
The Lib Tech Split BRD is pretty much the same. But, here’s where things get sort of interesting. Splitboards understand that camber really helps on the skin track. Most likely I’m starting to sound like a broken record with the splitboard profile things and touring. However, considering we spend 75% of the day or more going uphill, the way the board performs on the skin track needs to be the #1 focus moving forward, even if it’s not as rad as sending it downhill. Or at least that’s how I feel.
So what did Lib Tech do? They listened to the feedback from their customers, our past reviews of the Goldmember and Travis Rice Splitboard and so forth. When the splitboard community found out Lib Tech was making a new splitboard with a profile that was more skin track friendly people started asking questions, would it work?
$ 1,249.99 (CAD)View
Amazon.com Price: $899.98 (as of 06/03/2023 13:07 MDT) Details
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon.com at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
For this splitboard test, I rode the 162 Wide version of the Lib Tech Split BRD, and I forgot it was Wide until I grabbed it for this review. What’s that mean, well the board rides much smaller than it is. Available in 3 sizes, 154, 159 and 162.
Lib Tech was able to make this splitboard even more freestyle friendly by lightened the amount of material found in the top sheet at the tip and tail of the Split BRD, they’re calling this tech: Ultra Light Spin Slim.
Toss in Magne-Traction contact points, 7 of them on each edge and you have boards (built in the PNW) that can chew through the heaviest snow around Baker and slice through cold smoke in Colorado while holding an edge on icy lines when you need it most. Pretty much perfect right?
Splitboard Touring & Skin Issues
Paging the manufactures, if you are going to manufacture, market and sell splitboards consider making skins to go along with the splitboards. Or team up with a skin company. Why do you ask? Well, a couple of reasons. Jones Snowboards, Ferburg and a few others (please leave a comment) are sending skins out that are factory cut to the splitboard length.
Personally, I hate cutting skins, as if you mess up even in the smallest place you’re looking at potential skin failure. I prefer to take them to a shop and have the pro’s cut them for me. Guessing most splitboarders just go to town with the mail opener tool and hope for the best.
Ok, so now the skins have been cut if the bottom of the splitboard has a wavy profile, it’s going to be tough to get a skin to sit flat against the ski. Even more so if the board has rocker at the tip and tail and then camber next to it, the change from profiles is far from skin-friendly.
I’m not saying we need to go 100% rocker or 100% camber, BUT the profiles must be able to link up with each other with skins attached. This seems to be a major issue with Lib Tech and any other brands wanting the RC, Banana, etc… tech.
As splitboarders where do we go from here?
The Lib Tech Split BRD can handle the deepest of powder you throw its way. This board really should only be ridden in such conditions, and splitboarding, in general, should be that way. With an Eco-conscious build, Lib Tech’s bio-plastic top sheet which is made from you guessed it, beans offering the industries highest strength-to-weight ratio, Birch Sidewalls, and the super-light Paulownia wooden core.
If you’re in the market for a Camber3 directional splitboard built for crushing deep snow. The Lib Tech Split BRD ($999.99) should be on your wish list.
Is Travis Rice the best person to be following advise from when it comes to splitboarding. The guy is a beast and one of the best snowboarders of all time, but he’s not a splitboarder.
Hello, thanks for a great detailed review!
My perfect charging board (snowboard) is 156-158 at a flex of 6-7 (out od 10). What size than you would recommend for a split BRD to match the feel?
G3 knife cuts skins perfectly . Takes off about a mm inside edges. Can be purchased just about anywhere you buy backcountry stuff
That little mail opener tool is the same thing a shop tech uses when he goes to town on your skins. I guess we vary in opinion because not only do I enjoy cutting my own skins, I prefer to. I know that I’m going to pay more attention to detail than some guy making minimum wage watching the clock until its beer:30. Sounds like your advocating that all brands adopt flat profiles like Venture? Please, no. Camber under foot is for more than just pop, it’s for better traction on steeper skin tracks. I’ve ridden flat profile split boards and they are just as inferior on the way up as they are on the down. Did you really just say that “splitboarding, in general, should really only be enjoyed on the deepest of powder days?” If every time I went out it was a powder day then I’m probably dead and in snowboarding Valhalla. That doesn’t mean I’m not going to hang up the board on bluebird spring corn days. You’re weird
How much do these weigh? Why is it not listed anywhere? What are they hiding? Can you throw it on a scale for the good folks out there.
I’ve had absolutely no issues on multiple trips since last spring with the union skins I cut myself, both on edges and sticking to the bottom. just gotta make sure there is some edge and a tiny bit of base on either side on the skin on the bottom. in the image above there is a large amount of overhang almost like the skins weren’t trimmed at all. if the skins were trimmed well and taken care of properly, I don’t see having the issues you describe.
most touring ski’s also have a fairly mixed profile as well, so I’m not sure if that’s the issue either — camber with early rise is the correct profile here. also, as the owner of many c3 boards — they are way more just normal camber with some early rise than the sticker on the bottom of the deck shows….this rides a lot like my old emmagators.
best split I’ve ridden so far!!!
Hmmm me thinks you aren’t very talented at putting skins on
Sorry, this is not an intentional troll maneuver, but…if you can’t cut skins yourself with confidence, should you really be in the game of writing reviews where you focus on issues with the skins…I’ve used a number of rcrcr boards without the issues you describe
Then, this Splitboard is better than the Travis Rice models ??
How is it if you compare this splitboard whith the Neo Slasher .
Do you have reviews with the Hovercraft Split or Jones Solution?